What I got from Miwon Kwon’s One Place After Another: Site-Specific Art and Locational Identity is
that art doesn’t have to be just the painting, but it could be where the
painting is placed. Art doesn’t have to be something that is hanging in some
fancy gallery, but it can be the litter that fills the street. I might be going
about this the wrong way, but the artists that venture the standard path can be
showing us the world unknown. After reading Olivia’s post on this topic, it
became clear to me that these artists are representing the invisible. They are
going outside of the notion that art is just pretty, they are bring to life
things that most doesn’t even know exist. This is closely related to what we were
talking about in class of the invisible city and how we make it visible by
taking pictures of it. These artists are
doing the same thing that we were doing. I didn’t understand this reading very
much and I could be reading it all wrong. Hopefully I’m not, but if I am then
please correct me.
I like the idea that art can be a piece of garbage on the sidewalk.
ReplyDelete